fedpkg build version numbering discrepancy
Jean-Marc Pigeon
jmp at safe.ca
Fri Jan 28 02:23:00 UTC 2011
Hello,
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 21:16 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 21:05 -0500, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote:
> > Let be straight and simple (package name doesn't
> > matter here)
> >
> > 1) Spec file say version: 1.2.3
> > 2) sources file say tar file: 1.0.0
> > "sources" as included in git and generated
> > by fedpkg new-sources
> >
> > Koji build say, "compiling 1.2.3 everything fine"
> > but rpm contents itself is build with 1.0.0
> >
> > This what I noticed this afternoon
>
> Nope. clement-2.1.400-1.fc15.src.rpm contains clement-2.1.400.tar.gz
> and not clement-2.1.320.tar.gz.
>
> Sources can be in either the "sources" file or the git repository.
> Since you added clement-2.1.400.tar.gz to the repository, Koji took it
> from there.
Ok, this means having an uptodate "sources" file is not
mandatory. I pushed the tar file in
same time as spec to GIT, koji was smart enough to forgive
my error.
So I can work one way or the other...
right?
>
> --
> Matt
>
--
A bientôt
==========================================================================
Jean-Marc Pigeon Internet: jmp at safe.ca
SAFE Inc. Phone: (514) 493-4280
Fax: (514) 493-1946
Clement, 'a kiss solution' to get rid of SPAM (at last)
Clement' Home base <"http://www.clement.safe.ca">
==========================================================================
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3917 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110127/073ce360/attachment.bin
More information about the devel
mailing list