fedpkg build version numbering discrepancy

Jean-Marc Pigeon jmp at safe.ca
Fri Jan 28 02:23:00 UTC 2011


Hello,

On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 21:16 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 21:05 -0500, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote:
> > 	Let be straight and simple (package name doesn't
> > 	matter here)
> > 
> > 	1) Spec file say version: 1.2.3
> > 	2) sources file say tar file: 1.0.0 
> > 	   "sources" as included in git and generated
> > 	   by fedpkg new-sources
> > 
> > 	Koji build say, "compiling 1.2.3 everything fine"
> > 	but rpm contents itself is build with 1.0.0
> > 
> > 	This what I noticed this afternoon
> 
> Nope.  clement-2.1.400-1.fc15.src.rpm contains clement-2.1.400.tar.gz
> and not clement-2.1.320.tar.gz.
> 
> Sources can be in either the "sources" file or the git repository.
> Since you added clement-2.1.400.tar.gz to the repository, Koji took it
> from there.
	Ok, this means having an uptodate "sources" file is not
	mandatory.  I pushed the tar file in
	same time as spec to GIT, koji was smart enough to forgive
	my error.

	So I can work one way or the other...
	right?

> 
> -- 
> Matt
> 

-- 
A bientôt
==========================================================================
Jean-Marc Pigeon                                   Internet: jmp at safe.ca
SAFE Inc.                                          Phone: (514) 493-4280
                                                   Fax:   (514) 493-1946
        Clement, 'a kiss solution' to get rid of SPAM (at last)
           Clement' Home base <"http://www.clement.safe.ca">
==========================================================================
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3917 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110127/073ce360/attachment.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list