Deprecating portreserve

["Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"]

On 07/11/2011 03:08 PM, Tim Waugh wrote:
> The BMC thing sounds a bit more special-purpose than portreserve, and
> presumably could be done in its own package that could perhaps be
> installed as needed depending on the hardware.
>
> So is the next step to deprecate portreserve?  What actually needs to be
> done for that to happen?
>

I guess figure out what requires portreserve and ping those ?

JBG