[ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16

Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com
Tue Jul 12 21:24:05 UTC 2011


On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 16:00 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:

> > Orphan: libsexy
> >     awn-extras-applets requires libsexy-devel = 0.1.11-17.fc16
> >     gmpc requires libsexy.so.2
> >     gmpc requires libsexy-devel = 0.1.11-17.fc16
> >     gwaei requires libsexy.so.2
> >     gwaei requires libsexy-devel = 0.1.11-17.fc16
> >     libsexymm requires libsexy.so.2
> >     libsexymm requires libsexy-devel = 0.1.11-17.fc16
> >     libsexymm-devel requires pkgconfig(libsexy) = 0.1.11
> >     libsexymm-devel requires libsexy-devel = 0.1.11-17.fc16
> >     perl-Gtk2-Sexy requires libsexy.so.2
> >     perl-Gtk2-Sexy requires libsexy-devel = 0.1.11-17.fc16
> >     python-sexy requires libsexy.so.2
> >     python-sexy requires libsexy-devel = 0.1.11-17.fc16
> >     python-sexy requires libsexy = 0.1.11-17.fc16
> >     xchat requires libsexy.so.2
> >     xchat requires libsexy-devel = 0.1.11-17.fc16
> >     xchat-gnome requires libsexy.so.2
> >     xchat-gnome requires libsexy-devel = 0.1.11-17.fc16

> I've taken ownership of these three, mostly to keep xmms2 and xchat from
> breaking.

I believe the idea is that libsexy should be able to die now, as all it
did should be possible through other libs, so probably the things that
use it (and that aren't intermediary widgets like libsexymm and
python-sexy and so on) need to get ported away from it...
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw
http://www.happyassassin.net



More information about the devel mailing list