BTRFS: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

[Bruno Wolff III]

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 16:54:44 -0500,
  Michael Cronenworth <mike at cchtml.com> wrote:
> Farkas Levente wrote:
> > if you said that this's the current state of btrfs than it's not ready
> > as a default fs for f16. so please postpone it at least to f17.
> 
> If f16 gets kernel 3.1 (or backported stuff into 3.0), IMHO there is no 
> reason to slip it one release.

It's very likely that F16 will get 3.1. 3.2 probably won't be ready in
time. 3.0 is likely going to be out within a week. 3.1 should be ready
in plenty of time to be safe for F16.