BTRFS: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

[Reindl Harald]

Am 13.07.2011 23:51, schrieb Farkas Levente:
>> So there's my long ass explanation of why VMs on Btrfs suck.  I'm
>> sorry, I'm aware of the problem and I'm trying to fix it, but it's a
>> slow going process.
> 
> if you said that this's the current state of btrfs than it's not ready
> as a default fs for f16. so please postpone it at least to f17

+1

bleeeding edge / modern technology is not the same as dangerous defaults
unstable / unfinsihed packages should never be default in GA nor replace
existing and over a long time well working things - never!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110713/c4e83bb3/attachment.bin