thanks for F15 mdadm systemd unit

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Fri Jul 22 22:45:01 UTC 2011



Am 23.07.2011 00:17, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> I'd like to suggest: 
> 
> a) Please avoid getting personal, stick to technical arguments/issues. 

it is not my intention to get personally and hurt anybody
as person, really!

i try to get borked things fixed which i can not fix by myself
and had to learn that things are only changed if they are
hurting enough people

believe me, there are thousands of users out there which are perfectly
happy with F14 in different environemnts and waiting until
F14 is EOL for upgrading to F15 in the hope most of things
are fixed until then

> b) Is there any further useful discussion to be had in this thread? 
> Perhaps it's time to give it a rest for the weekend (or longer)

no problem, no rush NOW
but the time goes fast and F14-EOL will affect users in many ways

what i hardly need is a relieable mysqld in a way that every
service (and not only shipped with fedora ones) will 100% start
clean and much more feedback of "systemctl"

after that is clean and there is a way to backport to F15 i am partly
happy, but as long "systemctl start some.service" wil give no feedback
if the start was sucessful or not this is not acceptable for me because
in the time typing "systemctl status some.service" i ccould start to think
and look why it has failed

and i think you will also agree that it is boring restart a machine
over Lights-Out-Managment with some TB disks and the beast starts
filesystem-check without feedback and you can not hear if the
machine is frozen or still working, for someone this might
be a little probmem - for a perfectionist it is unacceptable
______________

the myslqd.service/mysqld.socket MUST working perfectly and after that i am
much more relaxed than now because my whole work of the last 10 years
depends on that and tjere was no single problem until systemd came in my life
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714426


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110723/c9e03c1b/attachment.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list