Handling lamson

[Praveen Kumar]

the distribution doesn't seem unreasonable/out of the ordinary in any sense.
> The first part where he prefers that it not be packaged at all is out of
> the
> odinary but from the conciliatory tone of the rest, perhaps its literally
> just him talking about his idea of an ideal world.
>
> You may package this.  You may want to let upstream know that you have and
> that he can feel free to direct people using the Fedora packages to our
> bugzilla/IRC channels.


> Naming wise... applications do not have to use python-* but a lot of python
> applications (lamson seems to be in this boat) contain python modules and
> those really should be named python-*.  Especially nowadays when we build
> python3 versions of a lot of modules.  From the sound of the review request
> ("I consider Lamson analogous to frameworks[...]") this should probably be
> named python-lamson.
>
> -Toshio
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>

Thanks Toshio
I will mail to upstream about lamson package.

Thanks and Regards,
Praveen Kumar
http://fedoraproject.org/
http://kumar-pravin.blogspot.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110723/81cd73a1/attachment.html