Adding ~/.local/bin to default PATH (was: Re: User-level instance of /bin in PATH)
Richard W.M. Jones
rjones at redhat.com
Tue Jul 26 16:49:43 UTC 2011
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:45:11AM -0430, Robert Marcano wrote:
> On 07/26/2011 08:36 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> > On 07/26/2011 08:03 AM, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
> >> 26.07.2011, 18:34, "Andrew Haley"<aph at redhat.com>:
> >>> On 26/07/11 10:22, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
> >>>> Since F15 ~/bin has been added to PATH, and commands that are
> >>>> supposed to run user scripts will work without changing into that
> >>>> directory. Meanwhile, ~/.local/bin isn't used. I'd like to propose
> >>>> that it is also added because technically it is ~/bin's brother.
> >>> I've never heard of ~/.local/bin . Are there many people who use
> >>> this? ~/bin is common.
> >> ~/.local/bin has been there by default.
> >> Unlike ~/bin, which is in PATH though not even created.
> > Where in the path do the user 'bin' elements appear in the path?
> In /etc/skel/.bash_profile they are added to the end and I think that is ok
This was added between bash-4.2.10 -2 and -3:
because of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699812
There is some rationale in that bug, but I think it's extremely bogus.
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)
More information about the devel