RPM version goes backward in Rawhide
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Wed Jul 27 16:19:08 UTC 2011
On 7/27/11 2:03 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> There is a big difference between "a package going backwards in its EVR
> and staying there" and "a package getting untagged because it breaks koji
> buildroot and with the plan to go forward in EVR as soon as the bug is
> found and fixed".
If it goes backwards to await a fix, that fix needs to be happening
within the same day or so. Not prolonged so that updates fail on users'
systems.
> In this case, the bad rpm-build broke koji builds, and since Rawhide
> may eat babies, it can happen that Rawhide users need downgrade manually
> while they have to wait for the fixed rpm-build.
We are trying very hard to kill the notion that "rawhide may eat
babies". It's non-productive. There are multiple ways to throw
baby-eating updates over the wall for testing before they get into
rawhide. Stop treating it like a dumping ground.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
More information about the devel
mailing list