RPM version goes backward in Rawhide

drago01 drago01 at gmail.com
Wed Jul 27 18:46:25 UTC 2011


On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 09:19:08 -0700, JK (Jesse) wrote:
>
>> On 7/27/11 2:03 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> > There is a big difference between "a package going backwards in its EVR
>> > and staying there" and "a package getting untagged because it breaks koji
>> > buildroot and with the plan to go forward in EVR as soon as the bug is
>> > found and fixed".
>>
>> If it goes backwards to await a fix, that fix needs to be happening
>> within the same day or so.
>
> Panu has mentioned that he will be looking into fixing this unexpected
> breakage. If that isn't acceptable to you, feel free to provide a fix
> faster.
>
>> Not prolonged so that updates fail on users'
>> systems.
>
> Do they fail in this case?
> Do you prefer rpm-build in koji buildroot to fail even longer?
> An issue with rpm-build on Rawhide installations is minor compared with
> Fedora's offical buildsys.
>
>> > In this case, the bad rpm-build broke koji builds, and since Rawhide
>> > may eat babies, it can happen that Rawhide users need downgrade manually
>> > while they have to wait for the fixed rpm-build.

The proper fix would have been to just use epoch. People can call them
evil all they want they are perfectly suitable for that kind of
problems.


More information about the devel mailing list