koji: kernel-2.6.40-3.fc15

[Reindl Harald]

Am 29.07.2011 19:39, schrieb Josh Boyer:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=256138
>>
>> does this mean that F15 will get a rebased 2.6.40 sooner or
>> later in stable repos to avoid troubles with the new versioning
>> and will not stuck at 2.6.38 the whole life cycle?
> 
> There should be a 2.6.40 in the F15 updates-testing after the next updates push

sounds good

i have running 2.6.40-4.fc15.x86_64 #1 SMP in my testing-virtual-machine since
some minutes, boot looked fine, after a minute a got a btrfs-stack-trace

hope this helps (no i do not tend use btrfs in production *gg*)

------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:1742!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
CPU 0
Modules linked in: usb_storage xt_limit xt_state xt_multiport iptable_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack
nf_defrag_ipv4 snd_ens1371 gameport snd_rawmidi snd_ac97_codec ac97_bus snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm snd_timer
snd soundcore vmw_balloon vmxnet3 snd_page_alloc shpchp raid10 btrfs zlib_deflate libcrc32c vmw_pvscsi [last
unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]

Pid: 786, comm: btrfs-transacti Not tainted 2.6.40-4.fc15.x86_64 #1 VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX
Desktop Reference Platform
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa005cf08>]  [<ffffffffa005cf08>] walk_down_log_tree+0x1ce/0x2c1 [btrfs]
RSP: 0018:ffff8800451c3bc0  EFLAGS: 00010282
RAX: 00000000ffffffa1 RBX: ffff8800451c3c5c RCX: 0000000000000001
RDX: 0000000000000100 RSI: 0000000000001000 RDI: ffff8800376595d0
RBP: ffff8800451c3c20 R08: ffffffffa0062784 R09: 0000000000020000
R10: 0000000000020000 R11: 000000000000000d R12: ffff880046c68090
R13: ffff8800459ac800 R14: ffff880039627980 R15: ffff8800451c3ca0
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88004ac00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 0000000001955298 CR3: 0000000047fe5000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Process btrfs-transacti (pid: 786, threadinfo ffff8800451c2000, task ffff880046771730)
Stack:
 ffff8800451c3c10 ffff880046e48000 fffffffffffffffa 00000000a1fd1000
 00001000451c3c00 0000000000006afd ffff8800459ac800 ffff880046c68090
 ffff8800459ac800 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff8800451c3ca0
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffffa005d07a>] walk_log_tree+0x7f/0x19e [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa005f021>] free_log_tree+0x3e/0x9d [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa005f249>] ? wait_for_writer+0xc5/0xc5 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa005f804>] btrfs_free_log+0x1d/0x2c [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa00325ee>] commit_fs_roots+0x8b/0x14b [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff81041325>] ? should_resched+0xe/0x2d
 [<ffffffff814b5abc>] ? _cond_resched+0xe/0x22
 [<ffffffffa00339d9>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x3e0/0x706 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff810703fa>] ? remove_wait_queue+0x3a/0x3a
 [<ffffffffa0034180>] ? start_transaction+0x20a/0x262 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff81041325>] ? should_resched+0xe/0x2d
 [<ffffffffa002e25c>] transaction_kthread+0x167/0x21e [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa002e0f5>] ? btrfs_congested_fn+0x86/0x86 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff8106fd0b>] kthread+0x84/0x8c
 [<ffffffff814be8e4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
 [<ffffffff8106fc87>] ? kthread_worker_fn+0x148/0x148
 [<ffffffff814be8e0>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
Code: 48 83 7d b0 fa 74 11 be cb 06 00 00 48 c7 c7 7f 9b 07 a0 e8 b1 7d ff e0 8b 55 c4 48 8b 75 b8 4c 89 ef e8 99
a4 fc ff 85 c0 74 02 <0f> 0b 4c 89 f7 e8 9b 3d ff ff eb 70 48 8b 75 c8 48 89 c7 e8 91
RIP  [<ffffffffa005cf08>] walk_down_log_tree+0x1ce/0x2c1 [btrfs]
 RSP <ffff8800451c3bc0>
---[ end trace b6bdf8e508b8fce0 ]---

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110730/a16239bc/attachment-0001.bin