h.reindl at thelounge.net
Sat Jul 30 04:52:22 UTC 2011
Am 30.07.2011 04:16, schrieb Dave Jones:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 01:16:43AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > i have running 2.6.40-4.fc15.x86_64 #1 SMP in my testing-virtual-machine since
> > some minutes, boot looked fine, after a minute a got a btrfs-stack-trace
> > hope this helps (no i do not tend use btrfs in production *gg*)
> hmm, doesn't look like that one has been reported before.
> Can you file this in bugzilla please ? I expect Josef will want to take
> a look at it next week.
Am 30.07.2011 04:29, schrieb Genes MailLists:
> wasn't there some kind of issue in vm's ?
> Maybe I'm not remembering correctly
no - performance sucks if the VM is stored on a BTRFS formatted disk
this is a completly other problem and it must not make a differnece
if a FS is used inside or outside a virtual machine, not in 2011
the BTRFS-FS in this VM survived two dist-upgrades until now :-)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20110730/90a9f215/attachment.bin
More information about the devel