Installing bash-completion by default in F-16
pbrobinson at gmail.com
Thu Jun 2 14:04:59 UTC 2011
On 1 Jun 2011 21:54, "Ville Skyttä" <ville.skytta at iki.fi> wrote:
> I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In
> my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, and with my
> upstream hat on I expect things to further improve before F-16 is out.
> Why I'm writing here is that I'd like to hear opinions to which
> default-installed comps group should it be added (and set as default
> there) - in my opinion the serious candidates are admin-tools and base.
> admin-tools doesn't sound right because bash-completion is not really
> an admin tool (unless one considers interactive shell usage as admin
> activity in general), so I'm inclined to add it to base.
Things like bash completion have massive performance implications on network
and other slower file systems esp if its used for home directories. It
certainly shouldn't be in base.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel