F15 / VirtualBox
Richard W.M. Jones
rjones at redhat.com
Fri Jun 10 13:37:52 UTC 2011
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 08:08:26AM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> (i) Variable size image for the VM
> - it grows to accommodate need
Interested to know why sparse images or qcow2 don't fulfil your needs.
These have been supported in KVM (and Xen) since forever.
> (ii) Easy to duplicate VM image (with UUID change)
>
> So its easy to deploy images on same or different computers
This is what I do:
https://rwmj.wordpress.com/2010/09/24/tip-my-procedure-for-cloning-a-fedora-vm/
Also I'm still looking at what to do about the "virt-clone" tool:
https://rwmj.wordpress.com/2011/05/11/virt-tools-survey-virt-clone/
> (iii) All VM data is stored in user home
>
> This means installing a new OS does not negatively impact VM's
You can do this with KVM too. There is a performance penalty to using
files (but VirtualBox has the same penalty). With old libvirt you had
to set SELinux labels manually, but new versions do it for you.
> (iv) Control over the network
I actually prefer libvirt's default (private network with NAT)
configuration. It's good for what I do which is testing lots of VMs.
It's a lot better than Xen's default setting of "bugger up the network",
or VMware's "first, install these binary drivers in your kernel" config.
For production, I change libvirt to use a shared bridge by adjusting a
couple of configuration files:
http://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Networking#Bridged_networking_.28aka_.22shared_physical_device.22.29
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
More information about the devel
mailing list