Sergio Belkin sebelk at gmail.com
Sat Jun 11 04:20:07 UTC 2011


2011/6/11 Miloslav Trmač <mitr at volny.cz>:
> Hello,
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Sergio Belkin <sebelk at gmail.com> wrote:
>> ./configure LDFLAGS="-no-install"
> <snip>
>> configure:3659: gcc   -no-install conftest.c  >&5
>> gcc: error: unrecognized option '-no-install'
>
>> Do you have any idea?
>
> -no-install, which the command explicitly includes, is a libtool
> option, but not a valid gcc option.  I don't know why it is necessary
> to use -no-install, but if you do need it, you can probably patch
> Makefile* to include it in such a way that the operation of
> ./configure is not disrupted.
>    Mirek
> --

I've found an example here:

It's useful if someone wants to avoid the wrappers generation (look at the end):

http://www.flameeyes.eu/autotools-mythbuster/libtool/wrappers.html

Perhaps ./configure LDFLAGS="-no-install" is somewhat "heterodox" ....

-- 
--
Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org


More information about the devel mailing list