Fedora 14 and "Sandy Bridge" graphics
mzerqung at 0pointer.de
Mon Jun 13 07:13:26 UTC 2011
On Sun, 12.06.11 18:59, Reindl Harald (h.reindl at thelounge.net) wrote:
> Am 12.06.2011 18:56, schrieb drago01:
> > On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
> >> Am 12.06.2011 18:53, schrieb drago01:
> >>> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
> >>> upstart is still maintained and shipped, you should be able to install
> >>> and use it.
> >> and why in the world is systemd forced after a upgrade via yum where
> >> upstart was in use before - upgrades should left core configurations
> >> in peace!
> > Upgrade usually means progress not stagnation, if you want to stay in
> > the past don't upgrade.
> you said "upstart is still maintained and shipped, you should be able to
> install and use it" - so how and why damned must be a init-replace
> in a early state forced on a existing system?
systemd surpasses Upstart in every way. It's not in an "early
state". Upstart is much more limited and hence in a much earlier state
> normally this should be "systemd is also available for upgraded systems
> and you should be able to install and use it"
Yes, it was in F14.
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
More information about the devel