Packages that will be orphaned
tmraz at redhat.com
Mon Jun 20 19:06:03 UTC 2011
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 10:34 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Due to the requirement for contributors to sign the FPCA by Thursday of last
> week, certain package owners who haven't yet signed will be removed from the
> packager group soon. When that happens, the packages that they own will be
> To try and minimize the problems this could cause, I'm publishing the
> current list of packages to be orphaned and will start reassigning owners if
> someone asks to take them over. We want to make sure that important
> packages are not going to be orphaned by this change. We're planning on
> removing people from packager and orphaning packages on Thursday if all goes
> The list of packages being orphaned are listed below and the list of
> packages with first level dependencies will be attached. Note that the
> dependency list could be incomplete in two ways:
> 1) Since I'm using source package names, we don't capture things that dep on
> a subpackage.
> 2) The list does not follow the dep chain out to see if something relies on
> something that relies on something that relies on a package that's being
> Please reply to this thread if you'd like to take any packages or ping me on
> IRC and I'll reply to this thread with what packages have been taken.
> (Needed since we aren't orphaning in the pkgdb until Thursday so you need
> a cvsadmin to reassign ownership for now).
I'll take the following two:
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
More information about the devel