systemd: bugreports for missing service-files

Lennart Poettering mzerqung at
Mon Jun 20 23:23:46 UTC 2011

On Mon, 20.06.11 10:40, Adam Williamson (awilliam at wrote:

> On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 15:42 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > i need to be sorry because i never had thought that since "systemd" was
> > planned for F14 and not ready it will be for F15, and ready is for me
> > using it really as designed or delay the release again - it is unacceptable
> > fpr a production-environment fire up services in random order :-(
> You keep talking about 'random order' but I'm not sure this is accurate.
> My understanding was that systemd respects the dependency information in
> LSB-compliant headers and hence will fire these up in the correct order
> as long as the dependencies are correct. If there are any LSB-type
> headers with incorrect or incomplete dependency information, this is a
> bug that *can* be fixed with updates to F15.

Yes, Adam, your understanding is correct.

> I don't know if it respects the number-based ordering for services which
> simply don't include LSB-compliant dependency information at all.

Yes, it respects the number-based ordering between two services if
neither includes LSB information.


Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.

More information about the devel mailing list