systemd: bugreports for missing service-files

[Adam Williamson]

On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 13:31 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:

> So what is the point of effectively rewriting existing sysV services in a new
> sysV dialect now (to rewrite them again next release as native systemd units)
> instead or rewriting them directly as systemd services? In both cases there is
> a high risk of regressions as dependency logic was not tested before. Except
> that systemd works better with native units, so I'm far from sure the less
> risky path is to try to "fix" sysV services so they semi-work.

If you're so worried about the dependency logic, why not just update the
package and *remove* the incomplete or incorrect dependency statements
entirely, and thereby cause systemd to fall back on the numeric
ordering?
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net