Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2011-06-16 x86_64

[Paul Howarth]

On 06/24/2011 03:15 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 07:17:45PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
>> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
>> using rawhide from 2011-06-16
>
> As a reminder, please do not simply "CLOSED NOTABUG" your FTBFS bugs.
> By the time I started mass-filing 564 bugs yesterday, any packages I
> filed bugs against had failed to build at least 6 times through, so
> _something_ is failing.  It may not be a bug in your package; it may
> well be a bug in mock, or in a package you BR.  However, your package
> does FTBFS.
>
> If you believe this is actually a bug in another package, do NOT
> change the component in this bug or close this bug.  Instead, add the
> appropriate bug number from the other package to the "Depends on" line
> in this bug.  If the other package does not yet have a bug created
> that you think matches, please create one.  Doing so helps us properly
> track bugs and their dependencies, just as we track package
> dependencies.  (If you close this bug, and the other package is not
> fixed before the next FTBFS run, a new bug will get created.  Please
> follow the above advice to avoid such duplication.)
>
>
> There are a couple common failures we're seeing now:
>
...

> ** Sendmail bug 716460
> Error: Package: sendmail-8.14.5-1.fc16.x86_64 (ftbfs)
> Requires: libdb-5.1.so()(64bit)

sendmail-8.14.5-2.fc16, built against libdb-5.2, has been in Rawhide 
since 17th June.

http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-June/152920.html

Paul.