yum / dist-upgrade / memory

Michael Schroeder mls at suse.de
Fri May 27 09:45:32 UTC 2011


On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 06:00:57PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> You're definitely right that applydeltarpm has a *far* lower memory
> footprint than createdeltarpm.  But, looking at the original traceback,
> it looks like it isn't getting enough memory when it's trying to verify
> the sequence.

Hmm, to me the traceback looks like the fork() system call in
yum failed, so applydeltarpm isn't even running.

Cheers,
  Michael.

-- 
Michael Schroeder                                   mls at suse.de
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH,  GF Jeff Hawn, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg
main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);}


More information about the devel mailing list