yum / dist-upgrade / memory
Michael Schroeder
mls at suse.de
Fri May 27 09:45:32 UTC 2011
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 06:00:57PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> You're definitely right that applydeltarpm has a *far* lower memory
> footprint than createdeltarpm. But, looking at the original traceback,
> it looks like it isn't getting enough memory when it's trying to verify
> the sequence.
Hmm, to me the traceback looks like the fork() system call in
yum failed, so applydeltarpm isn't even running.
Cheers,
Michael.
--
Michael Schroeder mls at suse.de
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF Jeff Hawn, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg
main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);}
More information about the devel
mailing list