Fesco membership policies

[Peter Robinson]

On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
> Something that was brought up at the last fesco meeting is that
> fesco membership is currently restricted to members of the packaging
> group. That's arguably overly restrictive - fesco is intended to be the
> body with technical oversight over the entire project, not merely
> packaging, and in that situation it seems odd to restrict membership to
> a subset of the people under fesco's pervue.
>
> There's a few things we can do here. We can keep the status quo. We can
> add new groups such as qa. Or we can open it to the entire project and
> just assume that the electorate will ensure that nobody inappropriate
> gets elected.
>
> Anyone have opinions on what we should be doing here?

Sounds reasonable to me, is changes to FESCo something that needs to
be approved by the Board? (adding f-a-b mailing list for
clarification).

Peter