Fesco membership policies

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 04:19:50PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org> wrote:
> > Something that was brought up at the last fesco meeting is that
> > fesco membership is currently restricted to members of the packaging
> > group. That's arguably overly restrictive - fesco is intended to be the
> > body with technical oversight over the entire project, not merely
> > packaging, and in that situation it seems odd to restrict membership to
> > a subset of the people under fesco's pervue.
> >
> > There's a few things we can do here. We can keep the status quo. We can
> > add new groups such as qa. Or we can open it to the entire project and
> > just assume that the electorate will ensure that nobody inappropriate
> > gets elected.
> >
> > Anyone have opinions on what we should be doing here?
> 
> Sounds reasonable to me, is changes to FESCo something that needs to
> be approved by the Board? (adding f-a-b mailing list for
> clarification).
> 
Which option sounds reasonable? ;-)

Traditionally, Board approval is not needed here and I don't think
I personally would want to see that change at this point in time (not broke,
don't fix).

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20111114/f7a6e635/attachment-0001.bin