Fedora clean up process seems to be seriously broken...

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Mon Nov 21 21:58:50 UTC 2011



Am 21.11.2011 22:53, schrieb "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson":
> On 11/21/2011 09:25 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> Unconvincing. To "reassure ownership" periodicially won't be sufficient.
>> It would be just another button to click (like FAS password or cert
>> renewal) and would not guarantee that the packages would be maintained
>> properly and that tickets would be dealt with. A "sign of life" from a
>> person does not imply that the person's packages are (well-)maintained.
>>
> 
> Well if people want more controversial proposal of sign of live that's 
> relatively easier to accomplish.
> 
> Revoke that maintainers package privileges for $next-release if he does 
> not respond to bug reports in timely manner in GA releases and orphan 
> his package.
> 
> Arguable a bit drasting but at the same time far more effective clean up 
> process.

+1

nothing is more frustrating for users as ignored bugreports reintroduced from
release to relase while th eonly response is from bugzapper about EOL of the
release

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20111121/71a4665c/attachment.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list