Fedora clean up process seems to be seriously broken...

Vít Ondruch vondruch at redhat.com
Tue Nov 22 16:50:32 UTC 2011


Dne 22.11.2011 17:44, Chris Adams napsal(a):
> Once upon a time, Vít Ondruch<vondruch at redhat.com>  said:
>> It would be reasonable, on the beginning of each development cycle, to
>> publish a list of packages which were not touched by it maintainer in
>> previous release. For all these packages, new co-maintainer could
>> stepped up and they would be granted the co-maintainers privileges
>> automatically.
> How is "not touched" automatically a problem that needs new maintainers?
> Not every package has rapid development that necessarily needs a package
> update within a 6 month period.
>

I am not saying it is automatically problem, but it might be. Its 
obvious that package, which is in latest version, probably doesn't need 
update. However that is not easy to track, as long as the upstream 
release monitoring is not mandatory.

I am not proposing change of owner or anything like this. I am speaking 
about new co-maintainer. There is nothing wrong about it I believe.


Vit


More information about the devel mailing list