unison formal review

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 19:22:28 +0200
Gregor Tätzner <gregor at freenet.de> wrote:

> Any news from the FESCO team? What's the conclusion of this
> discussion?

No one has officially asked fesco... 

Please file a ticket what you actually want to ask fesco here?

https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/newtplticket

Personally, I think that barring upstream waking up and deciding to
support different versions being able to talk to each other, we are
setup the best we can. 

I'm not sure how we could better setup the packages... whats the actual
proposal here? All of the versions in one package is not a good
solution, IMHO. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20111003/cc622ede/attachment.bin