Heads up: e2fsprogs-1.42-WIP-0702 pushed to rawhide

Farkas Levente lfarkas at lfarkas.org
Tue Oct 4 21:38:18 UTC 2011

On 10/04/2011 05:30 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> XFS has been proven at this scale on Linux for a very long time, is all.
>> the why rh do NOT support it in 32 bit? there're still system that
>> should have to run on 32 bit:-(
> 32-bit machines have a 32-bit index into the page cache; on x86, that limits
> us to 16T for XFS, as well.  So 32-bit is really not that interesting for
> large filesystem use.
> If you need really scalable filesystems, I'd suggest a 64-bit machine.

i mean if you support xfs and think it's better then ext4 why not
support it on rhel 32bit?

  Levente                               "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

More information about the devel mailing list