release number when upstream *only* has git hashes?
a.badger at gmail.com
Wed Oct 5 14:35:03 UTC 2011
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 06:53:50AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/04/2011 09:01 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > Now do we want to put the git hash into the version
> > field too?
> Yes, because "git checkouts by date" are not sufficiently reliable to
> provide deterministic checkouts from git.
I hope you don't really mean this. git hashes belong in the Release field;
not in the version field.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20111005/8349289c/attachment.bin
More information about the devel