Package review SIG dead?

tim.lauridsen at tim.lauridsen at
Fri Oct 7 14:41:49 UTC 2011

On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
<sochotnicky at> wrote:
> Excerpts from Richard Shaw's message of Thu Oct 06 22:17:51 +0200 2011:
>> After some initial interest there doesn't appear to be any activity
>> unless I'm missing something.
>> I am still interested. Anyone else?
> Sorry for taking time to reply, but I had a bit too many things at
> once sprung up on me
> So...During FUDCon Milan a few of us decided to do a hackfest
> session on timlau's FedoraReview tool[1].
> It seemed like a good base for a review tool, the basic architecture
> seemed flexible enough etc. Our latest version is at github[2] as
> well. Changes from timalu's version:
>  * split checks based on them being general or specific to certain
>   language
>  * dynamic loading - every python file dropped in checks subdir is
>   considered a test module.
>  * fix several problems with running local checks without bug in
>   bugzilla
>  * Cleaups, pep8 applications
> It would be great to have a way so that everyone can implement checks
> in their language of choice, but for the time being we did this.
> Idea is to have each SIG maintain their own checks/templates together
> with their guidelines.
> I know a lot of people wanted to have a discussion about this first,
> but since we had the opportunity to hack on this we did. I believe
> there are still many of us still interested, just not knowing what
> exactly we should do next.
> [1]
> [2]
> --
> Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky at>
> Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
> PGP: 7B087241
> Red Hat Inc.                     
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at

Looks like very nice additions to my tool, I have not had to much time
to improve the tool lately.
If you like, I can give access to the original git repo or we can move
it to the fedora git, but github makes it easier to people to make
forks etc.


More information about the devel mailing list