PA 1.0 for FC16?
Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ)
ngompa13 at gmail.com
Sat Oct 8 19:44:10 UTC 2011
There were a lot of changes, but the only program I know of that would
absolutely break from those changes is padevchooser, which has long since
been recommended and not usable, since avahi takes care of that quite
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:14:50 -0500
> Michael Cronenworth <mike at cchtml.com> wrote:
> > On 10/08/2011 01:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > If Ubuntu is doing a better job than us of shipping an updated
> > > version of OUR OWN FEATURE, we're failing very badly.
> > >
> > > What happened to "First" in the 4 'F's?
> > >
> > > Our objectives are NOT to deliver current software only 6+ months
> > > after the competition.
> > Create a FESCO ticket and get it brought up in a meeting.
> I'd personally like to see more discussion/convincing of the
> maintainers before asking FESCo.
> On the pro side we have:
> - Wine needs it.
> On the con side we have:
> - Lots of changes? (I have no idea).
> - High chance for regression? or is this mostly just bugfixes?
> Perhaps maintainer(s) could explain why they are reluctant to push this
> into f16 with more specificity?
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel