PA 1.0 for FC16?
Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ)
ngompa13 at gmail.com
Sat Oct 8 19:45:22 UTC 2011
Eerm, I mean recommended as not usable. Using padevchooser breaks most
PulseAudio environments even now, so don't use it.
2011/10/8 Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) <ngompa13 at gmail.com>
> There were a lot of changes, but the only program I know of that would
> absolutely break from those changes is padevchooser, which has long since
> been recommended and not usable, since avahi takes care of that quite
> : http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/PulseAudio/Notes/1.0
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:14:50 -0500
>> Michael Cronenworth <mike at cchtml.com> wrote:
>> > On 10/08/2011 01:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> > > If Ubuntu is doing a better job than us of shipping an updated
>> > > version of OUR OWN FEATURE, we're failing very badly.
>> > >
>> > > What happened to "First" in the 4 'F's?
>> > >
>> > > Our objectives are NOT to deliver current software only 6+ months
>> > > after the competition.
>> > Create a FESCO ticket and get it brought up in a meeting.
>> I'd personally like to see more discussion/convincing of the
>> maintainers before asking FESCo.
>> On the pro side we have:
>> - Wine needs it.
>> On the con side we have:
>> - Lots of changes? (I have no idea).
>> - High chance for regression? or is this mostly just bugfixes?
>> Perhaps maintainer(s) could explain why they are reluctant to push this
>> into f16 with more specificity?
>> devel mailing list
>> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel