PA 1.0 for FC16?

[Reindl Harald]

Am 08.10.2011 21:40, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:14:50 -0500
> Michael Cronenworth <mike at cchtml.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 10/08/2011 01:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> If Ubuntu is doing a better job than us of shipping an updated
>>> version of OUR OWN FEATURE, we're failing very badly.
>>>
>>> What happened to "First" in the 4 'F's?
>>>
>>> Our objectives are NOT to deliver current software only 6+ months
>>> after the competition.
>>
>> Create a FESCO ticket and get it brought up in a meeting.
> 
> I'd personally like to see more discussion/convincing of the
> maintainers before asking FESCo. 
> 
> On the pro side we have: 
> 
> - Wine needs it. 
> 
> On the con side we have: 
> 
> - Lots of changes? (I have no idea). 
> - High chance for regression? or is this mostly just bugfixes?

all articles i read in the past said for the developers the 1.0
is only a number - on the other side Lennart will push it only
to F17 - why?

http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/17548/pulseaudio-erreicht-version-10.html
> Die Entwickler selbst sprechen allerdings nur von einer Zahl, die keinerlei
> Bedeutung habe. Als Grund für die Freigabe der Version 1.0 nennen sie zum
> einen den breiten Einsatz des Systems und zum anderen den Willen, die
> Versionierung vereinfachen zu wollen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20111008/b3c87ea0/attachment.bin