PA 1.0 for FC16?
pbrobinson at gmail.com
Sat Oct 8 20:30:17 UTC 2011
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:14:50 -0500
> Michael Cronenworth <mike at cchtml.com> wrote:
>> On 10/08/2011 01:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> > If Ubuntu is doing a better job than us of shipping an updated
>> > version of OUR OWN FEATURE, we're failing very badly.
>> > What happened to "First" in the 4 'F's?
>> > Our objectives are NOT to deliver current software only 6+ months
>> > after the competition.
>> Create a FESCO ticket and get it brought up in a meeting.
> I'd personally like to see more discussion/convincing of the
> maintainers before asking FESCo.
> On the pro side we have:
> - Wine needs it.
> On the con side we have:
> - Lots of changes? (I have no idea).
> - High chance for regression? or is this mostly just bugfixes?
> Perhaps maintainer(s) could explain why they are reluctant to push this
> into f16 with more specificity?
Well we're suppose to be stabilising, its not in rawhide yet so any
form of impact can even be assessed and personally I would trust the
maintainer as he's also one of the upstream maintainers.
Also reading the reference bugs about wine I'd like to point out the following:
1) Wine audio is broken since F-15 as per bug # 28622 so this is not a
2) To quote bug # 10495 - "Yes, PulseAudio is supported through its
ALSA compatibility plugin. It's
possible that a PulseAudio driver might happen at some point, but there's no
plans for one at the moment."
3) I don't believe from reading the bugs that the wine problem will be
fixed by adding PA 1.0 but there might be a patch that could be added
to either PA or wine to fix or at least improve the problem.
More information about the devel