Reviving packages

[Neil Horman]

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 01:24:02PM -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
> In trying to clean up the broken dependencies report, I intend to revive
> three retired packages:
> 
> lwp:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745216
> 
> rpc2:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745218
> 
> rvm:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745219
> 
> In accordance with Fedora policy
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Deprecated_Package),
> I am posting here, and asking for help in re-reviewing these packages.
> They are all simple and should be quick reviews, I would appreciate any
> help in finishing off these reviews (will trade reviews or favors).
> 
> ~tom
> 
These are all needed for coda.  Last I looked at them, getting them building
properly was not so hard, getting them to run properly was a significant effort,
one that may not be worth it, unless there are way more coda users out there
than I'm aware of.  Keeping rpc2 and rvm might be of value, but at the very
least we should probably focus effort on moving coda away from lwp and onto
threads if at all possible.
Neil

> ==
> Fedora Project
> -- 
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel