Reviving packages

Tom Callaway tcallawa at
Tue Oct 11 17:46:56 UTC 2011

On 10/11/2011 01:42 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> These are all needed for coda.  Last I looked at them, getting them building
> properly was not so hard, getting them to run properly was a significant effort,
> one that may not be worth it, unless there are way more coda users out there
> than I'm aware of.  Keeping rpc2 and rvm might be of value, but at the very
> least we should probably focus effort on moving coda away from lwp and onto
> threads if at all possible.

I don't disagree with this at all, but in the interim, things seem to
work and I'm willing to look at bugs in this stack.


Fedora Project

More information about the devel mailing list