Reviving packages

[Tom Callaway]

On 10/11/2011 01:42 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> These are all needed for coda.  Last I looked at them, getting them building
> properly was not so hard, getting them to run properly was a significant effort,
> one that may not be worth it, unless there are way more coda users out there
> than I'm aware of.  Keeping rpc2 and rvm might be of value, but at the very
> least we should probably focus effort on moving coda away from lwp and onto
> threads if at all possible.

I don't disagree with this at all, but in the interim, things seem to
work and I'm willing to look at bugs in this stack.

~tom

==
Fedora Project