Package review SIG dead?

Gregor Tätzner gregor at freenet.de
Tue Oct 11 20:28:57 UTC 2011


Am Samstag, 8. Oktober 2011, 18:55:11 schrieb tim.lauridsen at gmail.com:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 17:49 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> On 10/07/2011 02:49 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> >> > I know a lot of people wanted to have a discussion about this first,
> >> > but since we had the opportunity to hack on this we did. I believe
> >> > there are still many of us still interested, just not knowing what
> >> > exactly we should do next.
> >> > 
> >> > [1] https://github.com/timlau/FedoraReview
> >> > [2] https://github.com/sochotnicky/FedoraReview/tree/lang-checks
> >> 
> >> This should be in the Fedora repository
> > 
> > I hear they're having trouble getting the package reviewed <ducks>
> > --
> 
> It is not the review there is the problem, it is these damn QA folks :)
> 
> Tim

cool stuff! anybody working on a package?

Greg

-- 
And 1.1.81 is officially BugFree(tm), so if you receive any bug-reports
on it, you know they are just evil lies."
(By Linus Torvalds, Linus.Torvalds at cs.helsinki.fi)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20111011/2a5f1ce7/attachment.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list