Building cpufreq modules into F16 kernel is it right or wrong?

Adam Jackson ajax at redhat.com
Mon Oct 17 19:02:10 UTC 2011


On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 21:54 +0300, alekcejk at googlemail.com wrote:

> But this assumption was wrong for my system which have BIOS option
> for disabling CPU frequency scaling (SpeedStep).
> 
> If SpeedStep is enabled in BIOS then kernel uses acpi-cpufreq built-in module
> but if I will disable frequency scaling in BIOS kernel still loads cpufreq module
> but p4-clockmod instead of acpi-cpufreq.

Why would you choose broken BIOS options?

- ajax
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20111017/5bc81a23/attachment.bin 


More information about the devel mailing list