BEWARE: a problematic glibc made it to stable (F16)
jwboyer at gmail.com
Fri Oct 21 10:42:04 UTC 2011
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'd vote for #1, but that's a much longer conversation that should be
>> had upstream and before we even get close to bringing it to FESCo.
> FESCo is the entity which can have that conversation with Glibc upstream
> on behalf of Fedora. Who else can?
The Glibc package maintainer. I'm pretty sure he understands
upstream, and FESCo should probably start the discussion with him
More information about the devel