PDFCrack - empty debuginfo file

Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com
Fri Oct 21 19:38:41 UTC 2011


On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 00:55 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 10/22/2011 12:44 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 22:06 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> >> On 10/21/2011 07:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>
> >>> If it's being stripped there's probably a good *reason* for it to be
> >>> stripped
> >>
> >> I'd say its much more likely that they're just trying to save some space
> >> on end user systems where stuff is built from source by users and the
> >> users are too lazy to strip things him/herself if they happen to want
> >> that.  In my experience, upstreams are receptive to patches that make
> >> the stripping behavior optional, for example "STRIP = strip" and
> >> invoking "$(STRIP)" in Makefile which can then be overridden for example
> >> with "make STRIP=/bin/true ...".
> > 
> > It's being stripped in the spec, not the upstream source.
> 
> where?  take a glance at the spec file
> 
> http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools/pdfcrack.spec

ah, sorry, I misread josh's email - he was looking at the koji log, not
the spec file. apologies.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net



More information about the devel mailing list