retire referencer in Fedora 16+ ?
sanjay.ankur at gmail.com
Tue Oct 25 10:11:10 UTC 2011
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 15:46 -0400, Alex Lancaster wrote:
> > My sentiments exactly. Better not to keep known broken packages
> > around; it's only going to cause grief for users if they find out they
> > can't even install the package.
> > Once it's fixed upstream to not rely on libgnomeuimm, it can easily be
> > added back to Fedora.
> > Alex, could you please follow the End of Life procedure to get it
> > removed from F16+?
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife
> Done: retired package in packagedb, removed files in git and filed
> rel-eng bug:
> (Will check comps now, to make sure it's removed from there too,
> if present).
Just wondering if we have another reference tool in the repos? Anyone?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20111025/dfa3595c/attachment.bin
More information about the devel