Another glibc change that nearly got pushed into F16

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 10:48 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On 10/26/2011 10:45 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > 
> > I forgot to add that it's probably a good idea to recompile any
> > package that was compiled against the -13 glibc package.
> > 
> > Strictly speaking, any package that uses a function that is defined
> > with __THROW or __NTH in the glibc header files, but it's probably
> > easier to compile every package.
> > 
> > Is there a Koji query to get a list of such packages?
> 
> which means delay f16, create a stable glibc, test it, then make a
> massrebuild and test again the result...


Richard, could you please open a FESCo ticket with as much information
as you have on this issue? This is something we need to track closely, I
think.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20111026/f2e03702/attachment.bin