Another glibc change that nearly got pushed into F16

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 09:30:21AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 10:48 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> > On 10/26/2011 10:45 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > 
> > > I forgot to add that it's probably a good idea to recompile any
> > > package that was compiled against the -13 glibc package.
> > > 
> > > Strictly speaking, any package that uses a function that is defined
> > > with __THROW or __NTH in the glibc header files, but it's probably
> > > easier to compile every package.
> > > 
> > > Is there a Koji query to get a list of such packages?
> > 
> > which means delay f16, create a stable glibc, test it, then make a
> > massrebuild and test again the result...
> 
> 
> Richard, could you please open a FESCo ticket with as much information
> as you have on this issue? This is something we need to track closely, I
> think.

https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/682

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)
http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora