New bodhi bugfix release in production

Garrett Holmstrom gholms at
Wed Oct 26 22:04:12 UTC 2011

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at> wrote:
> Or perhaps even:
> where anything after the FEDORA-YYYY-NNNNN doesn't matter, but could
> contain all the current packages in the update.

This sounds reasonable to me.  How feasible is teaching bodhi to parse
that sort of URI that way?

More information about the devel mailing list