GIMP vs. poppler licensing, was: So you want to test an unstable GIMP...
nils at redhat.com
Mon Sep 5 07:37:16 UTC 2011
On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 23:17 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Nils Philippsen wrote:
> > Legal question: is it better to put this in its own subpackage to be
> > able to specify this individual license, or would GIMP better have
> > "GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+ and (GPLv2 or GPLv3)" as its license?
> Not an actual answer to your question, but wouldn't the license of the PDF
> plugin be GPLv3 only rather than (GPLv2 or GPLv3), considering that GIMP is
Yes, indeed it would.
Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase
Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty
nils at redhat.com nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
More information about the devel