GIMP vs. poppler licensing, was: So you want to test an unstable GIMP...

[Nils Philippsen]

On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 23:17 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Nils Philippsen wrote:
> > Legal question: is it better to put this in its own subpackage to be
> > able to specify this individual license, or would GIMP better have
> > "GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+ and (GPLv2 or GPLv3)" as its license?
> 
> Not an actual answer to your question, but wouldn't the license of the PDF 
> plugin be GPLv3 only rather than (GPLv2 or GPLv3), considering that GIMP is 
> GPLv3+?

Yes, indeed it would.

Thanks,
Nils
-- 
Nils Philippsen      "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase 
Red Hat               a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty
nils at redhat.com       nor Safety."  --  Benjamin Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint:      C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011