openssh: no pre-release sanity check? [Re: ssh-to-rawhide hangs
Horst H. von Brand
vonbrand at inf.utfsm.cl
Mon Sep 12 03:44:57 UTC 2011
Clyde E. Kunkel <clydekunkel7734 at cox.net> wrote:
> On 09/11/2011 04:33 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> > darrell pfeifer wrote:
> >> Fails for me too, with the same error.
> > Thanks for confirming that.
> > I don't mean to be rude or inflammatory, but do have to wonder how such
> > a fundamentally-broken package was released -- even to rawhide. In the
> > fedora openssh release process, isn't there some sort of sanity check
> > that would catch this before inflicting it on all rawhide users?
> Maybe there needs to be a classification for rawhide similar to the
> karma system for updates-testing, but limited to just a set of packages
> that should just always work (maybe openssh would be one). For such
> packages, there should be a test validation set that the maintainer runs
> to automatically allow the package into rawhide.
> I know in the past when such things have been discussed, some
> maintainers chimed in that they do have test sets that they run on their
If that is so, that should count into whatever karma system is put in place.
> Doesn't have to be for all packages, just the ones that are critical or
> necessary. Yeah, defining those will be a challenge, but then what they
> hey, makes life interesting.
The problem is that what is critical for me might be completely irrelevant
for you. I.e., TeXlive _has_ to work for me, if libreoffice fails to work
it can be a annoyance at worst; most users will wonder what TeXlive is and
scream bloody murder when libreoffice has hickups. On this (work) machine
the SSH server is a convenience (for logging in from the phone when away
from my desk for a fast check or such), on my "server" it is the only
convenient way to get in.
Perhaps the Critical Path packages
<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Critical_Path_Packages> need extra care
during their lifetime, not just leading up to release? Perhaps OpenSSH
should be added (or placed in a separate "server critical" category, given
the above is mostly install/running/updating for "final users")?
BTW, I've seen several times that updating the server makes a running
instance non-responsive, but been too lazy to report it.
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000 Fax: +56 32 2797513
More information about the devel