what if native systemd service is slower than old sysvinit script?
mkkp4x4 at gmail.com
Wed Sep 14 15:47:33 UTC 2011
2011/9/14 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg at gmail.com>:
> On 09/14/2011 02:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> Is systemd boot actually any faster? There seems to be no
>> noticable difference in boot times for me over whatever we
>> were using in F14. ie. both methods still takes ages, far
>> longer than should be necessary.
> We arent optimising the default desktop install live or otherwise for an
> actual desktop install. It's currently aimed at "Generic" or "Corporate
> " installs.
> This is my HP Pavilion DM1 laptop bootup time with rooms for improvement
> after minor tweaking on rotating media with no loss of functionality
> what so ever.
> # systemd-analyze
> Startup finished in 5761ms (kernel) + 11938ms (userspace) = 17700ms
> I'm assuming the kernel time improves once we turn off debugging in it.
> Afaik none of the *DE groups are properly tweaking things for their
> target audience.
> Anything above 4 seconds on ssd's would I consider unacceptable ( I
> think Lennart and Kay are booting around s1><4s second on those )
I use ssd.
Startup finished in 1819ms (kernel) + 2495ms (initrd) + 8013ms
(userspace) = 12328ms
The slowest part is
old versions that are better than native services.
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
More information about the devel