what if native systemd service is slower than old sysvinit script?

Adam Williamson awilliam at redhat.com
Wed Sep 14 17:48:14 UTC 2011


On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 19:43 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 18:23 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> >
> >> What kind of disk is that? For a mechanical drive any gain from
> >> parallel startup  would get killed by disk seeks.
> >
> > There is no real 'gain' from parallel startup when switching from
> > upstart to systemd,
> 
> Well we never had "upstart" (it was just a renamed sysvinit i.e we
> didn't use any of its parallel startup stuff).

hum, I thought we were using its ability to parallel start things based
on LSB deps. oh well. it's certainly *capable* of that, anyway. so
parallelization is not a systemd win.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net



More information about the devel mailing list