what if native systemd service is slower than old sysvinit script?

Jan F. Chadima jchadima at redhat.com
Thu Sep 15 08:16:29 UTC 2011

It amazes me how much energy people spend on it to save 3 seconds a day. Of course, if the computer being turned daily. In the case of a server time saving is even more amazing. My 4 years old daughter no longer believes the merman, but many technically educated IT specialists still believe in lossless parallelization.  There is always a resource, which must be accessed sequentially. Is it a case of hardware such as CPU core, or a software resource with a semaphore. Changing processes of this resource is always spent some extra time. The school teaches that when a workman digs a well in 10 days, then 2 workers for 5 days and 240 workers per hour.  And it is the mistake sytemd authors. When watching the load of the virtual machine that starts with systemd it is clear to me that the total CPU consumption is significantly greater than in the case of upstart one. And so much power to lose synchronization and the result is yet uncertain. I can only say: if I only have 3 free seconds a day, I will watch with pleasure as my service accrues sequentially.

Jan F. Chadima
jchadima at redhat.com

More information about the devel mailing list