what if native systemd service is slower than old sysvinit script?
sclark at netwolves.com
Thu Sep 15 10:45:53 UTC 2011
On 09/15/2011 02:07 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Ralf Corsepius<rc040203 at freenet.de> wrote:
>> On 09/14/2011 06:23 PM, drago01 wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Ralf Corsepius<rc040203 at freenet.de> wrote:
>> Anyway, some more figures: On the same machine, bootup times when
>> booting from a (slow) external (IDE) USB2 HD:
>> - Fedora 15/i386: ca. 135 secs.
>> - Ubuntu 11.04/i386: ca. 70 secs.
>> [Here bootup time: Wirst watch measured time from "grub prompt" to
>> "login screen"]
>> It shows the effect of slow disks (60secs w/ internal HD vs. 2.15
>> minutes w/ USB HD), but raises questions on why Ubuntu appears to be so
>> much faster in this configuration.
> Do they both start the same services? Unless you "tweaked" your fedora
> installation where we start a bunch of stuff that pretty much nobody
> would use in a typical desktop system that is to be expected.
Is there a reason Fedora "starts a bunch of stuff that pretty much nobody
would use in a typical desktop system" ?
Fedora is certainly not targeted at the server/enterprise target, being on the bleeding edge and all.
Sr. Software Engineer III
Email: steve.clark at netwolves.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel