what if native systemd service is slower than old sysvinit script?
awilliam at redhat.com
Sat Sep 17 00:08:00 UTC 2011
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 08:48 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 09/16/2011 05:01 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 05:17:43PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> True. As far as GNOME goes, though, whenever you suggest 'bulletproof
> >> session management', they say 'that's what suspend is for'...
> > I'd like to see proper session management. However, the existing
> > X protocol is terrible (a KDE'er talked about the horrors @ Desktop
> > Summit), and session management itself is really difficult.
> Temptinh as it might be, just please keep session management away from
> the init daemon and let it do its one important job properly, robustly
> and well and not suffer the path to sure death of trying to be all
> things - just coz it can coz its PID 1,2, 3 etc.
We aren't really talking about systemd any more, in this branch of the
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
More information about the devel